[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201204162311.37499.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:11:37 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>,
ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCIe: Add PCIe runtime D3cold support
On Monday, April 16, 2012, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On 04/14/2012 03:41 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> > @@ -296,7 +296,8 @@ static void acpi_pci_propagate_run_wake(struct pci_bus *bus, bool enable)
> >> >
> >> > static int acpi_pci_run_wake(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
> >> > {
> >> > - if (dev->pme_interrupt)
> >> > + /* PME interrupt isn't available in the D3cold case */
> >> > + if (dev->pme_interrupt && !dev->runtime_d3cold)
> >
> > This whole thing is wrong. First off, I don't think that the runtime_d3cold
> > flag makes any sense. We already cover that in dev->pme_support.
> >
> > Second, pme_interrupt means that the _root_ _port_, not the device itself will
> > trigger an interrupt whenever the device sends the PME message to it (which
> > very well may happen for a device in D3_cold woken up by an external signal).
> >
>
> I rechecked this. The port does trigger PME interrupt, but after the WAKE# signal
> restores device power. So my comments "PME interrupt isn't available in the D3cold
> case" is wrong, but setup ACPI wakeup is still required.
What exactly do you mean by "setup ACPI wakeup"?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists