[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1334617517.25353.17.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:05:17 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@....ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM updates for the 3.4 merge window
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 15:53 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> kvm.git next is exposed to linux-next, where they get tested quite a
> lot. Granted it's mostly build testing, and people are unlikely to
> test
> kvm there, but they will test the non-kvm bits that creep in there.
>
> > The alternative would be that I don't have a -next tree, just
> collect patches and immediately send them to Avi. That way the main
> kvm tree would be broken more often, but at least we don't get these
> horrible synchronization latencies.
>
> That works too. Don't post immediately; 2-3 week batches would reduce
> noise.
Or do like I do with Kumar for FSL stuff... his stuff gets pulled via my
tree but his tree is in linux-next as well. There's no reason not to do
that.
That way, his next branch gets linux-next coverage whether it's in my
tree or not, and I pull when I put the final powerpc-next together,
which gives me a chance to do a quick vet "just in case" and sort out
any major conflict before it all goes to Linus.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists