linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2 -rt] lockdep: selftest: Only do hardirq context test for raw spinlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1334559716-18447-3-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:01:56 +0800
From:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To:	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, Yong Zhang <yong.zhang@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2 -rt] lockdep: selftest: Only do hardirq context test for raw spinlock

From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang@...driver.com>

On -rt there is no softirq context any more and rwlock is sleepable,
disable softirq context test and rwlock+irq test.

Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
---
 lib/locking-selftest.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/locking-selftest.c b/lib/locking-selftest.c
index c3eb261..23b8564 100644
--- a/lib/locking-selftest.c
+++ b/lib/locking-selftest.c
@@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ void locking_selftest(void)
 
 	printk("  --------------------------------------------------------------------------\n");
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
 	/*
 	 * irq-context testcases:
 	 */
@@ -1187,6 +1188,28 @@ void locking_selftest(void)
 
 	DO_TESTCASE_6x2("irq read-recursion", irq_read_recursion);
 //	DO_TESTCASE_6x2B("irq read-recursion #2", irq_read_recursion2);
+#else
+	/* On -rt, we only do hardirq context test for raw spinlock */
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A", irqsafe1_hard_spin, 12);
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A", irqsafe1_hard_spin, 21);
+
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-safe-A + irqs-on", irqsafe2B_hard_spin, 12);
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-safe-A + irqs-on", irqsafe2B_hard_spin, 21);
+
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1", irqsafe3_hard_spin, 123);
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1", irqsafe3_hard_spin, 132);
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1", irqsafe3_hard_spin, 213);
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1", irqsafe3_hard_spin, 231);
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1", irqsafe3_hard_spin, 312);
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1", irqsafe3_hard_spin, 321);
+
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2", irqsafe4_hard_spin, 123);
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2", irqsafe4_hard_spin, 132);
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2", irqsafe4_hard_spin, 213);
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2", irqsafe4_hard_spin, 231);
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2", irqsafe4_hard_spin, 312);
+	DO_TESTCASE_1B("hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2", irqsafe4_hard_spin, 321);
+#endif
 
 	if (unexpected_testcase_failures) {
 		printk("-----------------------------------------------------------------\n");
-- 
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/