[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+1xoqdJjTe+BMe_ebMBSg57gs2FA60T_0WKhrHvfDoE8AvCuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:42:47 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: New RCU related warning due to rcu_preempt_depth() changes
Hi Paul,
It looks like commit 7298b03 ("rcu: Move __rcu_read_lock() and
__rcu_read_unlock() to per-CPU variables") is causing the following
warning (I've added the extra fields on the second line):
[ 77.330920] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
mm/memory.c:3933
[ 77.336571] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, preempt count: 0,
preempt offset: 0, rcu depth: 1, pid: 5669, name: trinity
[ 77.344135] no locks held by trinity/5669.
[ 77.349644] Pid: 5669, comm: trinity Tainted: G W
3.4.0-rc3-next-20120417-sasha-dirty #83
[ 77.354401] Call Trace:
[ 77.355956] [<ffffffff810e83f3>] __might_sleep+0x1f3/0x210
[ 77.358811] [<ffffffff81198eaf>] might_fault+0x2f/0xa0
[ 77.361997] [<ffffffff810e3228>] schedule_tail+0x88/0xb0
[ 77.364671] [<ffffffff826a01d3>] ret_from_fork+0x13/0x80
As you can see, rcu_preempt_depth() returns 1 when running in that
context, which looks pretty odd.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists