[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120417093713.GD11918@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:37:13 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, acme@...stprotocols.net,
mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Add 'G' and 'H' modifiers to event parsing
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:10:30PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 06:23:00PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 17:59 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > -modifier_event [ukhp]{1,5}
> > > > +modifier_event [ukhpGH]{1,5}
> > >
> > > You'd also need to increase the 5 to 7 I think, unless there's a clear
> > > exclusion with some of the other flags.
> > >
> > > Hmm, as it stands I think the 5 is already too low: "ukhppp" is 6.
> > >
> > > We should really write this as ['u'] ['k'] ['h'] ['G'] ['H'] ['p'{1,3}],
> > > not the combined thing.
>
> you mean to match them strictly in parser, right?
> because what we have now can match also stuff like 'uuu' 'kkuu' ...
>
> So far it eludes me how to do that purely in flex and
> doing this via rules in bison seems like overkill.
>
> I'd rather keep it the way we have and do the extra check
> in parse_events_modifier function.. unless someone comes up
> with flex regular expression that would do that (which is
> possible given my regex knowledge..)
>
> also we need 8 characters for it, since this seems to be
> valid modifier: ukhGHppp
>
So want me to resend with 8 to fix missing GH for now? I can't think of
proper regex either.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists