linux-kernel - RE: About AT91: replace broken TWI driver i2c-at91.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <EF2E73589CA71846A15D0B2CDF79505D0905D5A78B@wm021.weinmann.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:59:06 +0200
From:	"Voss, Nikolaus" <N.Voss@...nmann.de>
To:	"Voss, Nikolaus" <N.Voss@...nmann.de>,
	"'Adrian Yanes'" <adrian.yanes@...to.fi>,
	"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"'linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	"'konsta.holtta@...to.fi'" <konsta.holtta@...to.fi>,
	"'ben-linux@...ff.org'" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	"'Hubert Feurstein'" <h.feurstein@...il.com>,
	"'Douglas Gilbert'" <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
Subject: RE: About AT91: replace broken TWI driver i2c-at91.c

Voss, Nikolaus wrote on 2012-04-17:
> Adrian Yanes wrote on 2012-04-16:
>> Changing the value to 400000 gives as ~356kHz rate instead of 400kHz,
>> maybe it is due to our processor/board, however, checking the specs of
>> the at91rm9200 (page 405) we found that the CLVID and the CHDIV are
>> calculated as follow:
>> 
>> T_low = (( CLDIV x 2^CKDIV) +3) + T_mck
>> T_high = (( CHDIV x 2^CKDIV) +3) + T_mck
>> 
>> which differs of the method suggested in the patch:
>> 
>> const int div = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(dev->clk), 2 * twi_clk) - 2;
> 
> G45 spec is slightly different: T_low = (CLDIV x 2^CKDIV + 4) x T_mck
> With
> twi_clk := 1 / (T_low + T_high) = 1 / (2 * T_low)
> and
> div := CLKDIV x 2^CKDIV = MCK / (2 * twi_clk) - 4
> the above line should be
> const int div = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(dev->clk), 2 * twi_clk) - 4;
> for G45 and
> const int div = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(dev->clk), 2 * twi_clk) - 3;
> for RM9200, right?

Strange: I measured the frequency of scl and I still get too low values
for offset 4 (instead of 2). On my G45 the correct offset seems to be
as high as 27.

Adrian, can you please give this a try?

Niko