[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8D4A28.7030802@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:47:04 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, xma@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] vhost_net: fix use after free of vq->ubufs
On 04/17/2012 06:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:19:42AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> > On 04/16/2012 09:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> > >On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 02:08:25PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> > >>When zerocopy socket is used, ubufs pointer were used in handle_tx()
>>>> > >>without any validation. This would cause NULL pointer deference after
>>>> > >>it has been freed in vhost_net_set_backend(). Fix this by check the
>>>> > >>pointer before using it.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>Signed-off-by: Jason Wang<jasowang@...hat.com>
>>> > >
>>> > >OK so it's NULL dereference and not user after free:)
>>> > >Also could you clarify how does this happen pls?
>>> > >Don't we always initialize ubufs when vhost_sock_zcopy is set?
>> >
>> > The problem happens when we want to disable backend. At this time
>> > ubufs were assigned to NULL and it may be dereferenced by
>> > handle_tx():
> Heh, I see. How about
> - zcopy = vhost_sock_zcopy(sock);
> + zcopy = vq->ubufs;
Yes, It's more is simpler.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists