[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8D5ABC.4030705@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:57:48 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Run PIT work in own kthread
On 04/17/2012 02:18 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-04-17 12:27, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 04/16/2012 09:26 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> We can't run PIT IRQ injection work in the interrupt context of the host
> >> timer. This would allow the user to influence the handler complexity by
> >> asking for a broadcast to a large number of VCPUs. Therefore, this work
> >> was pushed into workqueue context in 9d244caf2e. However, this prevents
> >> prioritizing the PIT injection over other task as workqueues share
> >> kernel threads.
> >>
> >> This replaces the workqueue with a kthread worker and gives that thread
> >> a name in the format "kvm-pit/<owner-process-pid>". That allows to
> >> identify and adjust the kthread priority according to the VM process
> >> parameters.
> >
> > Is this a new ABI?
>
> Yep. Scripts will use it, maybe even QEMU. Do you want this to appear in
> api.txt?
You already know the answer.
Please make it explicit that the thread is optional. This way, if we
gain real-time workqueue support, or eliminate it through some other
trick, userspace won't break.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists