linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, microcode: Ensure that module is only loaded for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F8D7A0A.4080404@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:41:22 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
CC:	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, microcode: Ensure that module is only loaded
 for

On 04/16/2012 07:13 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 02:12:00PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> I guess a similar change in intel microcode driver would also be
>> worthwhile, right? If so, then the below patch might be useful:
> 
> AFAICT, you'd need to test this on a box which is not supported (family
> check below). Or you can tweak the family check so that it doesn't
> apply and run it on a test box of yours to see whether the module still
> unloads properly in the error case (and doesn't remain loaded as in
> our case due to something in sysfs remaining registered although it
> shouldn't).
> 


Judging by the nature of the code itself, its evident that this problem
is not restricted to AMD alone. In any case, I went ahead and did the
(tweaked) test that you suggested and here is the result:

1. dmesg logs :
[   21.912451] microcode: CPU0 not a capable Intel processor
[   21.916028] microcode: CPU1 not a capable Intel processor
[   21.934624] microcode: CPU2 not a capable Intel processor
[   21.940276] microcode: CPU3 not a capable Intel processor
[   21.946023] microcode: CPU4 not a capable Intel processor
[   21.951678] microcode: CPU5 not a capable Intel processor
[   21.957326] microcode: CPU6 not a capable Intel processor
[   21.962935] microcode: CPU7 not a capable Intel processor
[   21.968611] microcode: CPU8 not a capable Intel processor
[   21.974212] microcode: CPU9 not a capable Intel processor
[   21.979842] microcode: CPU10 not a capable Intel processor
[   21.985577] microcode: CPU11 not a capable Intel processor
[   21.991323] microcode: CPU12 not a capable Intel processor
[   21.997055] microcode: CPU13 not a capable Intel processor
[   22.002774] microcode: CPU14 not a capable Intel processor
[   22.008460] microcode: CPU15 not a capable Intel processor
[   22.014600] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba

2. lsmod | grep microcode
microcode             117749  0

3. rmmod microcode

4. dmesg logs:
[   64.297638] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   64.302332] WARNING: at fs/sysfs/group.c:142 sysfs_remove_group+0xd9/0xe0()
[   64.309446] Hardware name: IBM System x -[7870C4Q]-
[   64.309449] sysfs group ffffffffa03a5110 not found for kobject 'cpu0'
[   64.309451] Modules linked in: ipv6 cpufreq_conservative cpufreq_userspace cpufreq_powersave acpi_cpufreq mperf fuse loop dm_mod coretemp crc32c_intel shpchp microcode(-) cdc_ether usbnet ioatdma bnx2 mii serio_raw pcspkr pci_hotplug i2c_i801 i7core_edac i2c_core dca edac_core iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support tpm_tis tpm sg tpm_bios rtc_cmos button uhci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore usb_common sd_mod crc_t10dif edd ext3 mbcache jbd fan processor mptsas mptscsih mptbase scsi_transport_sas scsi_mod thermal thermal_sys hwmon
[   64.309499] Pid: 6529, comm: rmmod Not tainted 3.4.0-rc3-intelucodebroken-0.0.0.28.36b5ec9-default #2
[   64.309501] Call Trace:
[   64.309506]  [<ffffffff811fac69>] ? sysfs_remove_group+0xd9/0xe0
[   64.309510]  [<ffffffff811fac69>] ? sysfs_remove_group+0xd9/0xe0
[   64.309516]  [<ffffffff8103dd2a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xb0
[   64.309522]  [<ffffffff8103de01>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x41/0x50
[   64.309526]  [<ffffffff811f87b6>] ? sysfs_get_dirent+0x56/0x80
[   64.309531]  [<ffffffff811fac69>] sysfs_remove_group+0xd9/0xe0
[   64.309538]  [<ffffffffa03a2118>] mc_device_remove+0x78/0xa0 [microcode]
[   64.309545]  [<ffffffff8134b219>] subsys_interface_unregister+0x89/0xd0
[   64.309553]  [<ffffffffa03a357a>] microcode_exit+0x5a/0xa4 [microcode]
[   64.309559]  [<ffffffff810b0c8a>] sys_delete_module+0x16a/0x2b0
[   64.309565]  [<ffffffff810a408d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x12d/0x1b0
[   64.309573]  [<ffffffff814b36f9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[   64.309576] ---[ end trace 748ddf8b4218f820 ]---


The above warning was repeated for each cpu, of course.
 
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/