[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120417154549.GA27426@fieldses.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:45:49 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>,
Malahal Naineni <malahal@...ibm.com>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"pstaubach@...grid.com" <pstaubach@...grid.com>,
"viro@...IV.linux.org.uk" <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"michael.brantley@...haw.com" <michael.brantley@...haw.com>,
"sven.breuner@...m.fraunhofer.de" <sven.breuner@...m.fraunhofer.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] vfs: make fstatat retry on ESTALE errors from
getattr call
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:20:35AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Well, it's possible, but it seems pathological to me for a server to do
> that...
>
> Bruce and I were discussing this the other day. It would be good to add
> something like this to the RFCs:
>
> "On a PUTFH, a server SHOULD hold a reference to the filehandle such
For "filehandle" I'd specify "current and saved filehandle".
> that it does not go stale over the life of the compound."
And that's *much* less of a burden on the server than requiring that the
compound execute atomically.
> ...or something along those lines. That's a different matter though and
> not directly related to this. :)
Yes.
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists