[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8DD148.4000902@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:23:36 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, shawn.guo@...escale.com,
kernel@...gutronix.de, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
rob.herring@...xeda.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: imx6q: switch to use pinctrl driver
On 04/13/2012 10:18 AM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> From: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>
>
> ---
> This patch is used for test the new pinctrl driver.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-arm2.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-arm2.dts
> usdhc@...9c000 { /* uSDHC4 */
> fsl,card-wired;
> vmmc-supply = <®_3p3v>;
> status = "okay";
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_usdhc4_1>;
> };
>
> uart4: uart@...f0000 {
> status = "okay";
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_uart4_1>;
> };
That seems reasonable.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
> + usdhc4 {
> + pinctrl_usdhc4_1: usdhc4grp-1 {
I'm slightly confused about how this part of the binding is structured.
I'd expect the label "pinctrl_usdhc4_1:" to point at the node "usdhc4"
here. As written, there's no possibility of using a different pin
configuration values such as pull/drive-strength/... for some of the
pins, which I'm pretty sure will be an issue.
For example, see tegra-cardhu.dts - it has a pull up on the SDMMC data
and clock lines, but no pull on the SDMMC command line. I assume it's
this way because of some aspect of the SDMMC specification, rather than
something odd about Tegra.
I guess you've allowed a list of mux functions in the fsl,mux property.
Perhaps you can also allow a list in the other properties.
In that case though, what is the top-level usdhc4 node for? Perhaps it
groups multiple different available pin configurations for the USDHC4
controller together just as documentation? I don't think it's that
useful to do that; it doesn't actually convey any extra information, and
the fact the node is a configuration for the USDHC4 controller is
readily apparent from the node's label and name.
> + fsl,pins = "MX6Q_PAD_SD4_CMD",
> + "MX6Q_PAD_SD4_CLK",
> + "MX6Q_PAD_SD4_DAT0",
> + "MX6Q_PAD_SD4_DAT1",
> + "MX6Q_PAD_SD4_DAT2",
> + "MX6Q_PAD_SD4_DAT3",
> + "MX6Q_PAD_SD4_DAT4",
> + "MX6Q_PAD_SD4_DAT5",
> + "MX6Q_PAD_SD4_DAT6",
> + "MX6Q_PAD_SD4_DAT7";
> + fsl,mux = <0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1>;
> + fsl,pull = <1>;
> + fsl,pue = <1>;
> + fsl,pke = <1>;
> + fsl,speed = <1>;
> + fsl,drive-strength = <3>;
> + fsl,slew-rate = <1>;
> + fsl,hysteresis = <1>;
> + };
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -467,6 +469,12 @@ static int __devinit sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> clk_prepare_enable(clk);
> pltfm_host->clk = clk;
>
> + imx_data->p = pinctrl_get_select_default(&pdev->dev);
If you use devm_pinctrl_get_select_default() here (once it's checked in) ...
> no_card_detect_pin:
> no_board_data:
> + pinctrl_put(imx_data->p);
... you don't need that ...
> @@ -586,6 +596,8 @@ static int __devexit sdhci_esdhc_imx_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> gpio_free(boarddata->cd_gpio);
> }
>
> + pinctrl_put(imx_data->p);
... or that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists