[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120417210905.GJ6498@mwanda>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:09:05 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Cc: arm@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
thierry.reding@...onic-design.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
axel.lin@...il.com, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
marek.vasut@...il.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
kevin.wells@....com, srinivas.bakki@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] ARM: LPC32xx: clock.c update
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:08:22PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Besides switching to the default macro CLKDEV_INIT() for clock registration,
> this patch actually updates the clock registrations of pl08xdmac.
>
When there is a cleanup and a new feature added in the same patch,
it makes it hard to read... :/ So when we update pl08xdmac:
- CLKDEV_INIT(NULL, "clk_dmac", &clk_dma),
+ CLKDEV_INIT("pl08xdmac", NULL, &clk_dma),
What does that actually do? Is it a bug fix?
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists