[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120418045615.GU29100@oktetlabs.ru>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:56:15 +0400
From: "Alexandra N. Kossovsky" <Alexandra.Kossovsky@...etlabs.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, Yurij.Plotnikov@...etlabs.ru,
davidel@...ilserver.org, nelhage@...hage.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] epoll: clear the tfile_check_list on -ELOOP
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:13:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:34:52 -0400
> Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > An epoll_ctl(,EPOLL_CTL_ADD,,) operation can return '-ELOOP' to prevent
> > circular epoll dependencies from being created. However, in that case
> > we do not properly clear the 'tfile_check_list'. Thus, add a call to
> > clear_tfile_check_list() for the -ELOOP case.
>
> So here I am wondering what effect this bug has upon our users, so I
> can decide which kernel versions should be fixed. Jason didn't tell me
> so I went to read the description of clear_tfile_check_list(). After a
> brief chuckle, I stopped.
>
> I then found Yurij's original report, so I know what's going on. But I
> still can't write your changelog because I don't know whether this is a
> regression and if it is, which patch caused the regression.
It is a regression, somewhere between 3.2.6 and 3.2.9.
Yurij and me blame
commit 203aa5260edca2ab1872ad8b08386d874f7132f3
Author: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Date: Thu Jan 12 17:17:43 2012 -0800
but we have not tested it.
--
Alexandra N. Kossovsky
OKTET Labs (http://www.oktetlabs.ru/)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists