[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8E7A19.303@antcom.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:23:53 +0200
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC: arm@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
thierry.reding@...onic-design.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
axel.lin@...il.com, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
marek.vasut@...il.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
kevin.wells@....com, srinivas.bakki@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] ohci-nxp: Driver cleanup
On 04/17/2012 10:57 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:08:20PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> @@ -435,6 +436,7 @@ static int __devinit usb_hcd_nxp_probe(s
>> }
>>
>> __raw_writel(__raw_readl(USB_CTRL) | USB_HOST_NEED_CLK_EN, USB_CTRL);
>> + __raw_writel(__raw_readl(USB_CTRL) & ~USB_DEV_NEED_CLK_EN, USB_CTRL);
>>
>> /* Set to enable all needed USB clocks */
>> __raw_writel(USB_CLOCK_MASK, USB_OTG_CLK_CTRL);
>
> What does this chunk do? Is this part of the "* Fixed controller
> initialization (bits)" bullet point? How does it affect the user?
> Should it be included in the 3.4 kernel?
Thanks for the hint! I will drop this hunk. Originally, it made sure
that USB_DEV_NEED_CLK_EN is disabled but due to another change:
usb_hcd_nxp_probe() {
...
__raw_writel(USB_SLAVE_HCLK_EN | PAD_CONTROL_LAST_DRIVEN, USB_CTRL);
this bit is already cleared anyway.
(Would have been uncritical for v3.4 anyway, relating only to the other
changes introduced in my 3.5 patches.)
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists