[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120418092019.GB2232@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:20:19 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@...escale.com>
Cc: Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] lib: add support for stmp-style devices
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 05:05:52PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 08:43:20AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > > include/linux/stmp_device.h | 20 +++++++++++
> > > IMHO, this header should be placed at include/linux/fsl/.
> >
> > Hmm, one never knows if somewhen in the future some other vendor decides to do
> > do a device with this register layout. It is just a layout, not an IP core per
> > se. So, I'd prefer to leave it as is.
> >
>
> Acked-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>
Thanks!
>
> I'm converting mxs-dma driver to be mach-independent which also needs
> this patch.
>
> Do you know when this will be merged?
Nope. I assumed it could go in via arm-soc, since it makes sense and
Arnd used to comment this series. He is probably busy, currently.
> BTW, one small question:
> Is it possible that stmp_reset_block also be used by other vendors?
Sure, why not? I could ask a friend to to do an FPGA for me with this
layout.
> If not, i guess include/linux/fsl which already exists may be the
> right place.
Which is a bad choice in my book. linux/dma would have been the proper
thing for mxs-dma.h, I'd think.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists