linux-kernel - Re: [v3.4-rc1] ACPI regression bisected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1334741105.1924.5.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:25:05 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@...glemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3.4-rc1] ACPI regression bisected

On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 22:42 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > For 3.4 I think reverting is the right approach.
> 
> Ack.

A revert of 6fe0d0628245fdcd6fad8b837c81e8f7ebc3364d ("ACPI: Make ACPI
interrupt threaded") wasn't included in v3.4-rc3. Has it been pushed
somewhere? Is testing needed before that revert can be pushed?


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/