[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8E8B58.1040203@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:37:28 +0200
From: Pascal Chapperon <pascal.chapperon@...adoo.fr>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...oraproject.org
Subject: Re: RCU related performance regression in 3.3
Le 16/04/2012 23:02, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
.
>> So it seems that mount and unmount operations are often slower with
>> RCU_FAST_NO_HZ during boot and shutdown. Are these operations also
>> slower during runtime? If so, the RCU event tracing across both a fast
>> and a slow mount or unmount operation would likely be quite helpful.
-
Mount and umount operations are not slower with RCU_FAST_NO_HZ during
runtime; systemctl start and stop operations are also not slower. In
fact, i couldn't find a single operation slower during runtime with
RCU_FAST_NO_HZ.
-
>
> Actually, one other possibility is that RCU_FAST_NO_HZ's timer is
> being migrated. If you get a chance, could you please try out the
> diagnostic patch below?
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> rcu: Check for timer migration for RCU_FAST_NO_HZ
>
> If RCU_FAST_NO_HZ's timer is migrated, then the CPU that went dyntick-idle
> with callbacks might never wake up, which could indefinitely postpone
> invocation of its callbacks, which could in turn result in a system hang.
> But if the timer is migrated, then it might actually fire. In contrast,
> if it remains on the CPU that posted it, it is guaranteed to be cancelled.
>
> This patch therefore adds a WARN_ON_ONCE() to this timer's handler as
> a diagnostic test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> index c023464..67ee640 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> @@ -2053,6 +2053,7 @@ static bool rcu_cpu_has_nonlazy_callbacks(int cpu)
> */
> static enum hrtimer_restart rcu_idle_gp_timer_func(struct hrtimer *hrtp)
> {
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> trace_rcu_prep_idle("Timer");
> return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
> }
>
>
-
The result below.
Pascal
[ 0.758325] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.758330] WARNING: at kernel/rcutree_plugin.h:2056
rcu_idle_gp_timer_func+0x27/0x30()
[ 0.758332] Hardware name: GX780R/GT780R/GT780DXR/GT783R
[ 0.758334] Modules linked in:
[ 0.758337] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.4.0-rc2-rcu+ #38
[ 0.758338] Call Trace:
[ 0.758340] <IRQ>
[<ffffffff81057a1f>]warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
[ 0.758348] [<ffffffff81057a7a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
[ 0.758350] [<ffffffff810e61e7>] rcu_idle_gp_timer_func+0x27/0x30
[ 0.758354] [<ffffffff8107d5f1>] __run_hrtimer+0x71/0x1e0
[ 0.758357] [<ffffffff810e61c0>] ? rcu_batches_completed+0x20/0x20
[ 0.758360] [<ffffffff8107df3b>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xeb/0x210
[ 0.758365] [<ffffffff81601dd9>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x69/0x99
[ 0.758368] [<ffffffff81600b4a>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x70
[ 0.758369] <EOI> [<ffffffff8101b979>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[ 0.758374] [<ffffffff8101cc05>] ? mwait_idle+0x95/0x230
[ 0.758377] [<ffffffff8101d629>] cpu_idle+0xd9/0x120
[ 0.758380] [<ffffffff815d4f0e>] rest_init+0x72/0x74
[ 0.758384] [<ffffffff81cf6c12>] start_kernel+0x3c1/0x3ce
[ 0.758386] [<ffffffff81cf6582>] ? loglevel+0x31/0x31
[ 0.758389] [<ffffffff81cf6346>
x86_64_start_reservations+0x131/0x135
[ 0.758392] [<ffffffff81cf6140>] ? early_idt_handlers+0x140/0x140
[ 0.758394] [<ffffffff81cf644c>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x102/0x111
[ 0.758398] ---[ end trace 82bc736bb33fe366 ]---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists