linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] KVM: MMU: introduce for_each_pte_list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F8E915E.2010705@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:03:10 +0800
From:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@...il.com>
CC:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] KVM: MMU: introduce for_each_pte_list_spte

On 04/17/2012 10:47 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:36:25 +0800
> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> I tested it with kernbench, no regression is found.
> 
> Because kernbench is not at all good test for this.
> 
>> It is not a problem since the iter and spte should be in the cache.
> 
> I have checked dirty-log-perf myself with this patch [01-07].
> 
> GET_DIRTY_LOG for 1GB dirty pages has become more than 15% slower.


By the way, what is the case did you test? ept = 1 ?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/