| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:06:00 +0800 From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com> To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...mcloud.com>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] add FALLOC_FL_NO_HIDE_STALE flag in fallocate On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 01:39:06PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Zheng Liu wrote: > > > > I auspect the real problem may be the lazy inode table zeroing being done in the kernel. If the test is run immediately after formatting the filesystem, then the kernel thread is busy writing to the disk in the background and interfering with your benchmark. > > > > > > Please format the filesystem with "-E lazy-itable-init=0", to avoid this behavior. > > > > I format the filesystem with this option, but it seems that it is > > useless. > > What do you mean by that ? It does not work as it's supposed to ? > ext4lazyinit kernel thread is still running ? Or the slowdown was not > caused by the lazy init in the first place ? Sorry, I have used this option and retry to run the benchmark, but the slowdown is still in there. Regards, Zheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists