[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8ED646.1040100@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:57:10 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...mcloud.com>
CC:	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] add FALLOC_FL_NO_HIDE_STALE flag in fallocate
On 4/17/12 11:59 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
...
> Secondly, your test program is not doing random writes to disk, but
> rather doing writes at 64kB intervals. There is logic in the
> uninitialized extent handling that will write zeros to an entire
> extent, rather than create many fragmented uninitialized extents.  It
> may be possible that you are zeroing out the entire file, and writing
> 16x as much data as you expect.
> 
> Cheers, Andreas
I don't think the testcase as written is triggering that behavior, though
other similar testcases might.  In this case the left-over uninit extents
are large enough that they don't get zeroed:
File size of /mnt/scratch/test is 268435456 (65536 blocks, blocksize 4096)
 ext logical physical expected length flags
   0       0    34816               1 
   1       1    34817              15 unwritten
   2      16    34832               1 
   3      17    34833              15 unwritten
   4      32    34848               1 
   5      33    34849              15 unwritten
...
Good guess though :)
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
