[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201204171846.37245.hartleys@visionengravers.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:46:36 -0700
From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, <vinod.koul@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] spi/spi-ep93xx.c: use dma_transfer_direction instead of dma_data_direction
A new enum indicating the dma channel direction was introduced by:
commit 49920bc66984a512f4bcc7735a61642cd0e4d6f2
dmaengine: add new enum dma_transfer_direction
The following commit changed spi-ep93xx to use the new enum:
commit a485df4b4404379786c4bdd258bc528b2617449d
spi, serial: move to dma_transfer_direction
In doing so a sparse warning was introduced:
warning: mixing different enum types
int enum dma_data_direction versus
int enum dma_transfer_direction
This is produced because the 'dir' passed in ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare
is an enum dma_data_direction and is being used to set the
dma_slave_config 'direction' which is now an enum dma_transfer_direction.
Fix this by converting spi-ep93xx to use the new enum type in all
places.
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...ux.intel.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index 6db2887..e805507 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -545,13 +545,12 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
* in case of failure.
*/
static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
-ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_data_direction dir)
+ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
{
struct spi_transfer *t = espi->current_msg->state;
struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *txd;
enum dma_slave_buswidth buswidth;
struct dma_slave_config conf;
- enum dma_transfer_direction slave_dirn;
struct scatterlist *sg;
struct sg_table *sgt;
struct dma_chan *chan;
@@ -567,14 +566,13 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_data_direction dir)
memset(&conf, 0, sizeof(conf));
conf.direction = dir;
- if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
+ if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
chan = espi->dma_rx;
buf = t->rx_buf;
sgt = &espi->rx_sgt;
conf.src_addr = espi->sspdr_phys;
conf.src_addr_width = buswidth;
- slave_dirn = DMA_DEV_TO_MEM;
} else {
chan = espi->dma_tx;
buf = t->tx_buf;
@@ -582,7 +580,6 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_data_direction dir)
conf.dst_addr = espi->sspdr_phys;
conf.dst_addr_width = buswidth;
- slave_dirn = DMA_MEM_TO_DEV;
}
ret = dmaengine_slave_config(chan, &conf);
@@ -633,8 +630,7 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_data_direction dir)
if (!nents)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- txd = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(chan, sgt->sgl, nents,
- slave_dirn, DMA_CTRL_ACK);
+ txd = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(chan, sgt->sgl, nents, dir, DMA_CTRL_ACK);
if (!txd) {
dma_unmap_sg(chan->device->dev, sgt->sgl, sgt->nents, dir);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -651,12 +647,12 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_data_direction dir)
* unmapped.
*/
static void ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
- enum dma_data_direction dir)
+ enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
{
struct dma_chan *chan;
struct sg_table *sgt;
- if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
+ if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
chan = espi->dma_rx;
sgt = &espi->rx_sgt;
} else {
@@ -677,16 +673,16 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
struct spi_message *msg = espi->current_msg;
struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *rxd, *txd;
- rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(espi, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+ rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
if (IS_ERR(rxd)) {
dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "DMA RX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(rxd));
msg->status = PTR_ERR(rxd);
return;
}
- txd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(espi, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+ txd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(espi, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
if (IS_ERR(txd)) {
- ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+ ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "DMA TX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(rxd));
msg->status = PTR_ERR(txd);
return;
@@ -705,8 +701,8 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
wait_for_completion(&espi->wait);
- ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
- ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+ ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
+ ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
}
/**
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists