lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:20:28 -0700
From:	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
To:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
CC:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
	"linux-mips@...ux-mips.org" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
	"ralf@...ux-mips.org" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	"Jean Delvare (PC drivers, core)" <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] i2c: Convert i2c-octeon.c to use device tree.

On 04/18/2012 08:16 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>>> -	if (i2c_data == NULL) {
>>>> -		dev_err(i2c->dev, "no I2C frequency data\n");
>>>> +	/*
>>>> +	 * "clock-rate" is a legacy binding, the official binding is
>>>> +	 * "clock-frequency".  Try the official one first and then
>>>> +	 * fall back if it doesn't exist.
>>>> +	 */
>>>> +	data = of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "clock-frequency",&len);
>>>> +	if (!data || len != sizeof(*data))
>>>> +		data = of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "clock-rate",&len);
>>>> +	if (data&&   len == sizeof(*data)) {
>>>> +		i2c->twsi_freq = be32_to_cpup(data);
>>>
>>> Can't you use of_property_read_u32?
>>
>> I will investigate, and use it if possible.
>
> Any outcome?

Yes, I have implemented Rob's suggestions.  A new patch set reflecting 
this is coming soon.

>
> And shouldn't the bindings be documented? Or are they only standard and
> we hide the legacy one?
>

Yes, they are documented here:

http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/3536/

look in the cavium-i2c.txt file.

Thanks,
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ