[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8EF8EF.5070001@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:25:03 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Lasse Collin <lasse.collin@...aani.org>
CC: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
qasdfgtyuiop <qasdfgtyuiop@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, alain@...ff.lu,
albin.tonnerre@...e-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: update compression algorithm info
On 04/18/2012 10:09 AM, Lasse Collin wrote:
>
> I think it is still safe to say that gzip and LZO are better than
> bzip2, XZ, or LZMA for compressing a kernel that will be loaded from a
> normal hard disk. It would be unusual if reading the disk was so slow
> that e.g. XZ would make the booting faster than gzip.
>
Not really, because the boot loader is dependent on the firmware, which
can sometimes be infernally stupid.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists