[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1204182124230.2542@ionos>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:25:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@...glemail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [v3.4-rc1] ACPI regression bisected
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > Linus, can you please apply directly?
>
> Applied. Can we perhaps also make request_threaded_irq() noisily
> reject things that are not marked IRQF_ONESHOT and have a NULL
> low-level handler?
Yes, it's on my (ever growing) todo list.
> That still allows people to do IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_ONESHOT, and that
> won't be rejected until somebody else actually tries to share it. Then
> it breaks that somebody else ;(
>
> Sadly, that would tend to break fairly silently.
>
> I wonder if we should make the mismatch error printout be
> unconditional (and make just the "dump_stack()" part be conditional on
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ)?
That's my plan.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists