| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120418025626.GB23877@home.goodmis.org> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:56:27 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: "Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:271 On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 01:27:24PM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > Hello. > > With linux-3.3.0, my computer at work is rather unstable. The kernel Have you tried other kernels? The leak just started with 3.3? > seems to leak memory, however, kmemleak finds nothing significant. > > Finally, the computer started swapping heavily and responded only via > ssh. In dmesg, I found this (repeated every two seconds): > > [ 6709.483956] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at > kernel/mutex.c:271 > [ 6709.483968] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1210, name: I'm a little baffled here, as preempt_count() is zero (in_atomic) and irqs are not disabled. > NetworkManager Ah there's your problem! (just kidding) > [ 6709.483974] INFO: lockdep is turned off. > [ 6709.483981] Pid: 1210, comm: NetworkManager Tainted: G I > 3.3.0-gentoo #4 > [ 6709.483987] Call Trace: > [ 6709.484006] [<ffffffff810683fc>] __might_sleep+0xff/0x103 > [ 6709.484019] [<ffffffff81548783>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2a/0x2ff > [ 6709.484031] [<ffffffff811261b5>] ? fget_light+0x6a/0x118 > [ 6709.484043] [<ffffffff8115a738>] inotify_poll+0x35/0x53 > [ 6709.484052] [<ffffffff81135eb1>] do_sys_poll+0x266/0x3f2 > [ 6709.484060] [<ffffffff81134e33>] ? poll_freewait+0x8f/0x8f > [ 6709.484069] [<ffffffff81134efa>] ? __pollwait+0xc7/0xc7 > [ 6709.484076] [<ffffffff81134efa>] ? __pollwait+0xc7/0xc7 > [ 6709.484084] [<ffffffff81134efa>] ? __pollwait+0xc7/0xc7 > [ 6709.484092] [<ffffffff81134efa>] ? __pollwait+0xc7/0xc7 > [ 6709.484099] [<ffffffff81134efa>] ? __pollwait+0xc7/0xc7 > [ 6709.484107] [<ffffffff81134efa>] ? __pollwait+0xc7/0xc7 > [ 6709.484118] [<ffffffff8112fde0>] ? putname+0x2d/0x36 > [ 6709.484127] [<ffffffff8112fde0>] ? putname+0x2d/0x36 > [ 6709.484138] [<ffffffff81045cb7>] ? timespec_add_safe+0x32/0x5f > [ 6709.484146] [<ffffffff81018078>] ? read_tsc+0x9/0x1b > [ 6709.484155] [<ffffffff8113509a>] ? poll_select_set_timeout+0x61/0x75 > [ 6709.484163] [<ffffffff811360d8>] sys_poll+0x4e/0xb7 > [ 6709.484173] [<ffffffff81552896>] sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x21 > Hmm, this can also be reported if you have an rcu leak. Which would also explain your memory leak. RCU is the kernel's "garbage collector" and if it gets stuck, then you will definitely start seeing memory leaks, as memory wont be freed. Paul, know of any fixes in RCU that could have caused this? -- Steve > The taint is due to nouveau. I am sure that this > "sleeping-in-invalid-context" report is a consequence of the memory leak > that I could not convert into something reportable. But still, it is > something that the kernel wants me to report, that's why this e-mail. > > The kernel is configured as CONFIG_PREEMPT=y, if this is relevant. > > -- > Alexander E. Patrakov > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists