linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] serial/8250_pci: Clear FIFOs for Intel ME Serial Over Lan device on BI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120418230007.GA9329@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:00:07 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:	Sudhakar Mamillapalli <sudhakar@...com>,
	Nhan H Mai <nhan.h.mai@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] serial/8250_pci: Clear FIFOs for Intel ME Serial
 Over Lan device on BI

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 03:36:40PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 02:10:58PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> From: Sudhakar Mamillapalli <sudhakar@...com>
> >>
> >> When using Serial Over Lan (SOL) over the virtual serial port in a Intel
> >> management engine (ME) device, on device reset the serial FIFOs need to
> >> be cleared to keep the FIFO indexes in-sync between the host and the
> >> engine.
> >>
> >> On a reset the serial device assertes BI, so using that as a cue FIFOs
> >> are cleared.  So for this purpose a new handle_break callback has been
> >> added.  One other problem is that the serial registers might temporarily
> >> go to 0 on reset of this device.  So instead of using the IER register
> >> read, if 0 returned use the ier value in uart_8250_port. This is hidden
> >> under a custom serial_in.
> >>
> >> Cc: Nhan H Mai <nhan.h.mai@...el.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sudhakar Mamillapalli <sudhakar@...com>
> >> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> >
> > What tree did you make this against?
> >
> > It fails with:
> > patching file drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.c
> > patching file drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h
> > patching file drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c
> > Hunk #2 FAILED at 1093.
> > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c.rej
> >
> > While that file hasn't been changed since it was moved to that location.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> 
> Hmm, I think this is because this patch depends on the reverts went
> into 3.4 via tty-linus.

Ah, ok, that makes more sense, let me go merge 3.4-rc3 into tty-next and
see if that solves the problem...

Yup, it did, thanks, I'll go apply these two patches now, sorry for the
noise.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/