linux-kernel - [PATCH] perf, x86: Disable sanity check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:24:09 -0700
From:	Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf, x86: Disable sanity check

Without this patch, applications with two different stack
regions (eg: native stack vs JIT stack) get truncated 
callchains even when RBP chaining is present. GDB shows proper
stack traces and the frame pointer chaining is intact.

This patch disables the (fp < RSP) check, hoping that other checks
in the code save the day for us. In our limited testing, this
didn't seem to break anything.

In the long term, we could potentially have userspace advise
the kernel on the range of valid stack addresses, so we don't 
spend a lot of time unwinding from bogus addresses.

Signed-off-by: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c |    3 ---
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 07f46ba..87d9abd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1596,9 +1596,6 @@ perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry, struct pt_regs *regs)
 		if (bytes != sizeof(frame))
 			break;
 
-		if ((unsigned long)fp < regs->sp)
-			break;
-
 		perf_callchain_store(entry, frame.return_address);
 		fp = frame.next_frame;
 	}
-- 
1.7.8.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/