[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8E3C7F.5040601@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:01:03 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@...il.com>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] KVM: MMU: introduce for_each_pte_list_spte
On 04/17/2012 10:47 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:36:25 +0800
> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> I tested it with kernbench, no regression is found.
>
> Because kernbench is not at all good test for this.
>
>> It is not a problem since the iter and spte should be in the cache.
>
> I have checked dirty-log-perf myself with this patch [01-07].
>
> GET_DIRTY_LOG for 1GB dirty pages has become more than 15% slower.
>
Thanks for your test!
Unbelievable, i will do more test and check it more carefully.
Could you please open your tool, then i can reproduction it and find the
real reason?
>
> Note: if you had checked the worst case latency with this patch series,
> you should have noticed this regression by yourself.
>
> Auto-test and kernbench are not enough to see the effect of this work.
>
I will check whether your tool is better then kernbench/autotest after
review your tool.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists