[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120418040632.GB31465@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:06:32 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [3.4-rc3] Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:57:21PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > This would show what functions the stack tracer is using.
> > >
> > > I just compiled the latest vanilla kernel and tried it out, and it
> > > worked for me.
> >
> > works on my other machines too with similar kernel configs, just not on the one I'm profiling.
>
> I have to ask. Is this a x86 box?
yeah, 64-bit Xeon circa 2008.
> Also, have you tested to see if function tracing works?
>
> # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
> # echo function > current_tracer
> # cat trace
>
> If function tracing doesn't work this wouldn't either.
That just prints out..
# tracer: function
#
# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 0/0 #P:4
#
# _-----=> irqs-off
# / _----=> need-resched
# | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
# || / _--=> preempt-depth
# ||| / delay
# TASK-PID CPU# |||| TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
# | | | |||| | |
> I'm also assuming you have CONFIG_STACKTRACE and
> CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT enabled. They should be selected, but configs
> can always get screwed up.
CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_STACKTRACE=y
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists