[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120419153428.GB1120@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:34:28 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Konrad Eisele <konrad@...sler.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, daniel@...sler.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sparc: task_cpu() for stopper thread on sparc32
returns 0
Added a few more people - as this patch touches a core file.
I expect we have an issue on sparc32 - that manifest
in this bug. But I do not know this code at all.
Sam
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:22:42AM +0200, Konrad Eisele wrote:
> The stopper thread for CPU > 0 (at least in sparc32)
> has on initialization task_cpu() set to zero even
> for CPUs > 0. The patch explicitly checks weather the
> CPU is allowed to run on the cpu that task_cpu()
> return or changes the return cpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Eisele <konrad@...sler.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/stop_task.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
> index 7b386e8..9201866 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,14 @@
> static int
> select_task_rq_stop(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
> {
> - return task_cpu(p); /* stop tasks as never migrate */
> + int ccpu, cpu , dcpu;
> + ccpu = cpu = task_cpu(p);
> + if (unlikely(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p)))) {
> + cpu = cpumask_first(tsk_cpus_allowed(p));
> + if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> + cpu = ccpu;
> + }
> + return cpu;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> --
> 1.6.1.3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists