[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1334860536.4452.0.camel@odin>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:35:36 +0100
From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Optimise enable/disable path for
always on regulators
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 13:30 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> If a regulator is always on for any reason then cache that when the
> consumer is created and use it to optimise away the need to take locks
> or recurse up the supply tree when consumers do enable or disable calls.
> The scheduling of asynchronous work for bulk enables is also skipped.
>
> We don't actually check if the device physically supports control on the
> basis that constraints allowing status changes on physically always on
> regulators are nonsensical anyway.
>
> This is a very common pattern in hardware - it's normal to have some
> power supplies that have either no software control or are critical to
> system function - so many systems should be able to benefit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists