linux-kernel - [ 06/75] drm/i915: properly compute dp dithering for user-created modes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:03:09 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Adam Jackson <ajax@...hat.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: [ 06/75] drm/i915: properly compute dp dithering for user-created modes

3.3-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>

commit c4867936474183332db4c19791a65fdad6474fd5 upstream.

We've only computed whether we need to fall back to 6bpc due to dp
link bandwidth constrains in mode_valid, but not mode_fixup. Under
various circumstances X likes to create new modes which then lack
proper 6bpc flags (if required), resulting in mode_fixup failures and
ultimately black screens.

Chris Wilson pointed out that we still get things wrong for bpp > 24,
but that should be fixed in another patch (and it'll be easier because
this patch consolidates the logic).

The likely culprit for this regression is

commit 3d794f87238f74d80e78a7611c7fbde8a54c85c2
Author: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
Date:   Wed Jan 25 08:16:25 2012 -0800

    drm/i915: Force explicit bpp selection for intel_dp_link_required

v2: Fix indentation and tune down the too bold claim that this should
fix the world. Both noticed by Chris Wilson.

v3: Try to really git add things.

Reported-and-tested-by: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...-lyon.org>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48170
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@...hat.com>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |   49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -219,14 +219,38 @@ intel_dp_max_data_rate(int max_link_cloc
 	return (max_link_clock * max_lanes * 8) / 10;
 }
 
+static bool
+intel_dp_adjust_dithering(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
+			  struct drm_display_mode *mode,
+			  struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
+{
+	int max_link_clock = intel_dp_link_clock(intel_dp_max_link_bw(intel_dp));
+	int max_lanes = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp);
+	int max_rate, mode_rate;
+
+	mode_rate = intel_dp_link_required(mode->clock, 24);
+	max_rate = intel_dp_max_data_rate(max_link_clock, max_lanes);
+
+	if (mode_rate > max_rate) {
+		mode_rate = intel_dp_link_required(mode->clock, 18);
+		if (mode_rate > max_rate)
+			return false;
+
+		if (adjusted_mode)
+			adjusted_mode->private_flags
+				|= INTEL_MODE_DP_FORCE_6BPC;
+
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 static int
 intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
 		    struct drm_display_mode *mode)
 {
 	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
-	int max_link_clock = intel_dp_link_clock(intel_dp_max_link_bw(intel_dp));
-	int max_lanes = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp);
-	int max_rate, mode_rate;
 
 	if (is_edp(intel_dp) && intel_dp->panel_fixed_mode) {
 		if (mode->hdisplay > intel_dp->panel_fixed_mode->hdisplay)
@@ -236,16 +260,8 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector
 			return MODE_PANEL;
 	}
 
-	mode_rate = intel_dp_link_required(mode->clock, 24);
-	max_rate = intel_dp_max_data_rate(max_link_clock, max_lanes);
-
-	if (mode_rate > max_rate) {
-			mode_rate = intel_dp_link_required(mode->clock, 18);
-			if (mode_rate > max_rate)
-				return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
-			else
-				mode->private_flags |= INTEL_MODE_DP_FORCE_6BPC;
-	}
+	if (!intel_dp_adjust_dithering(intel_dp, mode, NULL))
+		return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
 
 	if (mode->clock < 10000)
 		return MODE_CLOCK_LOW;
@@ -673,7 +689,7 @@ intel_dp_mode_fixup(struct drm_encoder *
 	int lane_count, clock;
 	int max_lane_count = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp);
 	int max_clock = intel_dp_max_link_bw(intel_dp) == DP_LINK_BW_2_7 ? 1 : 0;
-	int bpp = mode->private_flags & INTEL_MODE_DP_FORCE_6BPC ? 18 : 24;
+	int bpp;
 	static int bws[2] = { DP_LINK_BW_1_62, DP_LINK_BW_2_7 };
 
 	if (is_edp(intel_dp) && intel_dp->panel_fixed_mode) {
@@ -687,6 +703,11 @@ intel_dp_mode_fixup(struct drm_encoder *
 		mode->clock = intel_dp->panel_fixed_mode->clock;
 	}
 
+	if (!intel_dp_adjust_dithering(intel_dp, mode, adjusted_mode))
+		return false;
+
+	bpp = adjusted_mode->private_flags & INTEL_MODE_DP_FORCE_6BPC ? 18 : 24;
+
 	for (lane_count = 1; lane_count <= max_lane_count; lane_count <<= 1) {
 		for (clock = 0; clock <= max_clock; clock++) {
 			int link_avail = intel_dp_max_data_rate(intel_dp_link_clock(bws[clock]), lane_count);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/