[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMXH7KGgSmvfqUTC1bufBz0QXbt01dHsPo1cbRA9jLj9mGmfjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:18:55 -0500
From: Rob Lee <rob.lee@...aro.org>
To: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>, shawn.guo@...aro.org
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...aro.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx: Add common imx cpuidle init functionality.
>>> If I called imx_cpuidle_init directly from imx5 or imx6q init
>>> routines, it would be getting called before the coreinit_call of core
>>> cpuidle causing a failure. There were various other directions to
>>> take and all seemed less desirable than this one.
>>>
>>> One alternative would be to add a function to return the pointer to
>>> the cpuidle driver object based on the machine type. Functionality
>>> exists to identify imx5 as a machine type but not imx6q, so I couldn't
>>> use that machine based method without adding that extra code.
>>>
>>> Another alternative would be to add a general platform lateinit_call
>>> function to each platforms that support cpuidle.
>>
>> Just put the initcall into mm-imx5.c and check the cpu type. Then you
>> also don't have to make imx5_idle global.
>
> That solution is currently available for imx5 but for imx6q it implies
> adding the cpu type support for imx6q. Are you ok with that?
Sascha or Shawn, any further comments on my question?
Thanks,
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists