linux-kernel - [ 51/75] xhci: Dont write zeroed pointers to xHC registers.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:03:54 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
	Elric Fu <elricfu1@...il.com>
Subject: [ 51/75] xhci: Dont write zeroed pointers to xHC registers.

3.3-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>

commit 159e1fcc9a60fc7daba23ee8fcdb99799de3fe84 upstream.

When xhci_mem_cleanup() is called, we can't be sure if the xHC is
actually halted.  We can ask the xHC to halt by writing to the RUN bit
in the command register, but that might timeout due to a HW hang.

If the host controller is still running, we should not write zeroed
values to the event ring dequeue pointers or base tables, the DCBAA
pointers, or the command ring pointers.  Eric Fu reports his VIA VL800
host accesses the event ring pointers after a failed register restore on
resume from suspend.  The hypothesis is that the host never actually
halted before the register write to change the event ring pointer to
zero.

Remove all writes of zeroed values to pointer registers in
xhci_mem_cleanup().  Instead, make all callers of the function reset the
host controller first, which will reset those registers to zero.
xhci_mem_init() is the only caller that doesn't first halt and reset the
host controller before calling xhci_mem_cleanup().

This should be backported to kernels as old as 2.6.32.

Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Elric Fu <elricfu1@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c |    9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
@@ -1690,11 +1690,6 @@ void xhci_mem_cleanup(struct xhci_hcd *x
 	int i;

 	/* Free the Event Ring Segment Table and the actual Event Ring */
-	if (xhci->ir_set) {
-		xhci_writel(xhci, 0, &xhci->ir_set->erst_size);
-		xhci_write_64(xhci, 0, &xhci->ir_set->erst_base);
-		xhci_write_64(xhci, 0, &xhci->ir_set->erst_dequeue);
-	}
 	size = sizeof(struct xhci_erst_entry)*(xhci->erst.num_entries);
 	if (xhci->erst.entries)
 		dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev, size,
@@ -1706,7 +1701,6 @@ void xhci_mem_cleanup(struct xhci_hcd *x
 	xhci->event_ring = NULL;
 	xhci_dbg(xhci, "Freed event ring\n");

-	xhci_write_64(xhci, 0, &xhci->op_regs->cmd_ring);
 	if (xhci->cmd_ring)
 		xhci_ring_free(xhci, xhci->cmd_ring);
 	xhci->cmd_ring = NULL;
@@ -1735,7 +1729,6 @@ void xhci_mem_cleanup(struct xhci_hcd *x
 	xhci->medium_streams_pool = NULL;
 	xhci_dbg(xhci, "Freed medium stream array pool\n");

-	xhci_write_64(xhci, 0, &xhci->op_regs->dcbaa_ptr);
 	if (xhci->dcbaa)
 		dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*xhci->dcbaa),
 				xhci->dcbaa, xhci->dcbaa->dma);
@@ -2344,6 +2337,8 @@ int xhci_mem_init(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,

 fail:
 	xhci_warn(xhci, "Couldn't initialize memory\n");
+	xhci_halt(xhci);
+	xhci_reset(xhci);
 	xhci_mem_cleanup(xhci);
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/