linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, extable: Handle early exceptions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:16:05 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, extable: Handle early exceptions

On 04/19/2012 01:17 PM, David Daney wrote:
> 
> I usually see exception table sizes on the order of 2^10 entries, so I
> have to wonder how much you really gain from an O(1) implementation.
> 

One thing that probably would give more of a boost is to use a rbtree or
similar structure to figure out *which* extable (if any) we should be
looking at; right now it looks like we linearly walk the modules, and
don't even look to see if we are inside that module before we do a
bsearch in that module's extable...

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/