[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F908EA5.4060507@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:16:05 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, extable: Handle early exceptions
On 04/19/2012 01:17 PM, David Daney wrote:
>
> I usually see exception table sizes on the order of 2^10 entries, so I
> have to wonder how much you really gain from an O(1) implementation.
>
One thing that probably would give more of a boost is to use a rbtree or
similar structure to figure out *which* extable (if any) we should be
looking at; right now it looks like we linearly walk the modules, and
don't even look to see if we are inside that module before we do a
bsearch in that module's extable...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists