[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120420103110.GD3467@shadowen.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:31:10 +0100
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Bryce Harrington <bryce@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] [RFC] DRM locking issues during early open
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:40:35AM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> I've just revisited this, maybe I'm going insane but why does
> drm_global_mutex not stop this?
>
> drm_get_pci_dev takes drm_global_mutex before calling drm_fill_in_dev
> and drm_get_minor.
>
> Now the fops should be pointing at stub_open at this point, as we
> won't have switched to the per device fops yet,
> and one of the first things drm_stub_open does is take the
> drm_global_mutex before doing the idr lookup.
>
> So is the problem opening some sysfs or proc file early?
I may be reading things wrong but the initialisation does indeed hold
drm_global_mutex, but and back when this first occured we would have
been using kernel_lock() which was at least partially reentrant right?
Anyhow, I will go back to the reporter and try and get a proper
reproduce by, there is no point in fixing something which is something
else.
-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists