[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120420111229.GG25458@amd.local0.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:12:29 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] lglock: remove online variants of lock
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 05:33:41PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Optimizing the slow paths adds a lot of complexity. If you need to
> grab every lock often, you have other problems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Someone might cry about online vs possible discrepancy, but
I don't really mind.
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists