[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F916291.2020105@citrix.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:20:17 +0100
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
CC: Lin Ming <mlin@...pku.edu.cn>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/apic: implement io apic read with hypercall
On 20/04/12 14:12, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 13:53 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> Under what circumstances can these hypercalls fail? Would a BUG_ON be
>>> appropriate/
>> -EFAULT, -EPERM, anything xsm_apic() could return (which looks only to
>> be -EPERM).
> So either the guest has called a hypercall which it is not permitted to
> or it has called it with invalid parameters of one sort or another. Both
> of these would be a code bug in the guest and therefore asserting that
> no failure occurred is reasonable?
>
> What could the caller do with the error other than log it and collapse?
>
>> The call into Xen itself will return 0 as a value if an
>> invalid physbase is passed in the hypercall.
>> So a BUG_ON() is not safe/sensible for domU.
> I think you have successfully argued that it is ;-)
>
> Ian.
>
So I have. -EMoreCoffee
Yes - I meant to say that BUG_ON() was ok for domU.
--
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists