[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvzgRpJq_BRrfgGh-V-k9XQmSvSN6hmK+6jm86Vy7v3EVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:06:04 +0200
From: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/18] SMP: Boot and CPU hotplug refactoring - Part 1
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> This converts all architectures except m32r, mn10300, tile and UM to
> the new core facility. These architecture are calling fork_idle() in
> the very early boot code in smp_prepare_cpus() for unknown reasons.
> I haven't analyzed yet, whether this is on purpose or can be moved
> over to the generic facility. It'd be nice if the responsible maintainers
> could look into that as well.
SMP is marked as broken on UM, so I don't have any objections. :-)
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists