[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1334936991.3420.21.camel@chandra-lucid.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:49:51 -0500
From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@...ibm.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] [SCSI] scsi_dh: allow 3rd party multipath
drivers to use scsi_dh_detach
Mike,
First off, sorry for not responding on this earlier. When I saw the
original patch, I was thinking it is a generic policy issue, and James
would be a better person to make decision on this, and forgot about it.
Now only realized that James was waiting on me.
I am not very religious either, and agree with James on changing the
Changelog.
With that change,
Acked-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@...ibm.com>
Regards,
Chandra
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 19:17 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 10:45 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Allow 3rd party multipath drivers to programatically detach a scsi_dh
> > using the scsi_dh_detach() interface. This is as improvement over
> > requiring them to write 'detach' to /sys/block/sdX/queue/dh_state
> >
> > End result is both Linux and 3rd party multipath drivers can coexist
> > without compromising Linux's default handling of multipath LUNs.
> >
> > Linux has suffered from races associated with attaching a scsi_dh to a
> > device too late (after an HBA driver has started the SCSI device scan).
> > Attaching a scsi_dh too late results in default sense handling that does
> > not silently fail IO to passive paths, which creates excessive delays
> > and IO errors during normal boot on a system with hundreds of LUNs.
> >
> > To fix this the appropriate scsi_dh must be attached before the HBA
> > driver(s) are even loaded. But some scsi_dh are known to conflict with
> > 3rd party multipath drivers (e.g. both scsi_dh_alua and scsi_dh_emc
> > conflict with EMC PowerPath). This patch allows 3rd party drivers to
> > resolve the conflict by detaching an attached scsi_dh.
>
> This changelog is a bit misleading, isn't it?
>
> The basic problem is that binary only third party drivers can't use the
> scsi_dh_detach callback because it's GPL only. The only module I know
> which suffers this problem is powerpath, is that right?
>
> So this patch actually relaxes our GPL only policy to allow powerpath to
> detach correctly. I really don't like the characterisation in the
> current proposed changelog of this being a "third party" problem because
> quite a few third party modules actually provide source and are thus GPL
> compliant.
>
> The whole point of GPL only symbols is to make life difficult for binary
> modules, so I could just say this might be indicative of the success of
> that policy. On the other hand, I'm not going to be religious about
> this. If you get the ack of the dh handler maintainer (Chandra
> Seetharaman) I'll apply this policy relaxation with a proper changelog
> that says what we're doing (allowing powerpath to bind to the symbol).
>
> James
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists