[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120420172540.GF3467@shadowen.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:25:40 +0100
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Bryce Harrington <bryce@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] [RFC] DRM locking issues during early open
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:34:43AM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > I may be reading things wrong but the initialisation does indeed hold
> > drm_global_mutex, but and back when this first occured we would have
> > been using kernel_lock() which was at least partially reentrant right?
>
> Yup if we slept with the BKL held we'd have allowed others to get past it,
> but also I introduced the global mutex in pci a while back
Yeah I have managed to get access to more details on the bug, and
actually we are opening the drm device successfully, we then attempt a
DRM_SETVERSION ioctl on it and it is that that appears to fail both for
1.4 and 1.1.
It is somewhat perplexing to understand how that is possible, though I
will note that the stub f_ops do not contain an ioctl op but I cannot
see any mechanism by which we might return a validly open file without
putting the driver specific ops in it.
-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists