[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120420194121.GF15021@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:41:21 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Weirdness in __alloc_bootmem_node_high
On Fri 20-04-12 12:32:38, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> wrote:
> > This is what I can see in the current (Linus) git:
> > ./arch/sparc/Kconfig: select SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE
> > ./arch/powerpc/Kconfig: select SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE
> > ./arch/ia64/Kconfig: select SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE
> > ./arch/s390/Kconfig: select SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE
> > ./arch/s390/Kconfig: select SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> > ./arch/x86/Kconfig: select SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE if X86_64
> >
> > So there are more arches which enable SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP so the function
> > is used. Or am I missing something?
>
> MAX_DMA32_PFN is not defined for them.
Ahh, you are right except that it is defined for x86 but that one uses
nobootmem. I missed that point.
Thanks
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists