[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1334959051-18203-9-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:57:16 -0300
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devel@...nvz.org>, <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/23] don't force return value checking in res_counter_charge_nofail
Since we will succeed with the allocation no matter what, there
isn't the need to use __must_check with it. It can very well
be optional.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
---
include/linux/res_counter.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/res_counter.h b/include/linux/res_counter.h
index da81af0..f7621cf 100644
--- a/include/linux/res_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/res_counter.h
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ int __must_check res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val);
int __must_check res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val, struct res_counter **limit_fail_at);
-int __must_check res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter,
+int res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val, struct res_counter **limit_fail_at);
/*
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists