[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D854C92F57B1B347B57E531E78D05EAD10EC08@BGSMSX102.gar.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 03:48:35 +0000
From: "Pallala, Ramakrishna" <ramakrishna.pallala@...el.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@....fi>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] smb347_charger: Cleanup power supply registration
code in probe
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] smb347_charger: Cleanup power supply registration code in probe
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:00:18AM +0530, Ramakrishna Pallala wrote:
> > This patch checks if the usb or mains charging is enabled by the
> > platform before registering with the power supply class.
>
> I still don't like the idea of having the power-supplies registered conditionally. Now
> you need to check in every place whether the corresponding power-supply is registered or
> not which makes the code uglier and more prone to errors.
These are the reasons behind this patch submission:
1. if we don't support USB/AC charging don't enable it, saves
kernel resources and don't give user wrong idea about charging capabilities.
2. if a platform driver or any other chip can do USB/AC charging they will register with PS and
user/userspace will not get confused b/w two sysfs interfaces.
I will leave the decision the Anton.
Thanks,
Ram
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists