[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F91E9C1.4050102@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:57:05 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Android Alarm Driver Cleanups (for staging-next/3.5)
On 04/20/2012 03:08 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:31:43PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> Greg: Would you mind applying this set to staging-next for 3.5?
> It took some messing with (due to some over-eager people fixing spelling
> mistakes and compiler warnings that you didn't have in your tree), but
> I've applied these now. Thanks for doing this work.
>
> But, as I already said, this patch set produces some big compiler
> warnings, can you please fix them up before I get nasty messages from
> the linux-next maintainer?
Ok. So I manged to trigger the warning at patch 3/4 too. However, patch
4/4 resolves it.
The problem is the android alarm driver and the alarmtimer code have a
naming collision with "struct alarm", and there were some macros (see
CONFIG_ANDROID_ALARM_OLDDRV_COMPAT in staging/android/android_alarm.h
before these patches) that allow a easier transition over to the new
code for out of tree drivers.
Ideally I would have yanked those macros in 3/4 instead of 4/4. But
after 4/4 is applied the issue should not longer be present (at least
I've not been able to trigger it)
Do you want me to respin the last two patches?
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists