[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1397y55ej.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:51:00 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/43] userns: Convert ptrace, kill, set_priority permission checks to work with kuids and kgids
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com> writes:
> Quoting Eric W. Beiderman (ebiederm@...ssion.com):
>> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>>
>> Update the permission checks to use the new uid_eq and gid_eq helpers
>> and remove the now unnecessary user_ns equality comparison.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>> ---
>> @@ -1389,10 +1388,8 @@ static int kill_as_cred_perm(const struct cred *cred,
>> struct task_struct *target)
>> {
>> const struct cred *pcred = __task_cred(target);
>> - if (cred->user_ns != pcred->user_ns)
>> - return 0;
>> - if (cred->euid != pcred->suid && cred->euid != pcred->uid &&
>> - cred->uid != pcred->suid && cred->uid != pcred->uid)
>> + if (uid_eq(cred->euid, pcred->suid) && uid_eq(cred->euid, pcred->uid) &&
>
> These should be !uid_eq() right?
>> + uid_eq(cred->uid, pcred->suid) && uid_eq(cred->uid,
>pcred->uid))
Yes.
Thank you for catching this. This kind of mistake is unfortunately much
to easy to make.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists