lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120421122044.GF24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:20:45 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] ARM clps711x: Added Cirrus Logic EP7312 CPU
	variant

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:11:35PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 21 April 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > That's where we used to put truely hardware dependent stuff, rather than
> > machine type stuff when the structure was first implemented.  At that time
> > we had a number of different mach-* directories wanting to share things
> > like the acorn IOC/IOMD stuff, and there's also sharing of definitions
> > between CLPS711x and EP93xx.
> > 
> > That was long before we invented the plat-* stuff - but even that doesn't
> > actually cover what asm/hardware does - eg, the SA1111 stuff shared
> > between SA11x0 and PXA.
> 
> Ah, thanks for the explanation.
> 
> Since the clps7111 based asm/hardware/*.h files are not shared with ep93xx,
> I guess it makes sense to move them to mach-clps711x/include/mach/*.h as part of
> this cleanup series, right?

Yes.

> Out of these, only the first one is used in two places outside of
> arch/arm/mach-clps711x, the serial and the fb driver, which could
> be changed to use mach/hardware.h instead.

The headers still have to end up being in an accessible place, and having
drivers include the minimum required is a good idea.  Merely moving them
into include/mach and updating the include statements as far as I'd go.
(and I've never liked the idea of mach/hardware.h being an "include the
world for this platform" header file.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ