lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120421100113.4040ac700af6d2b04dda613f@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:01:13 +0900
From:	Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@...il.com>
To:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] KVM: MMU: introduce for_each_pte_list_spte

Sorry for the delay.

On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:01:03 +0800
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > I have checked dirty-log-perf myself with this patch [01-07].
> > 
> > GET_DIRTY_LOG for 1GB dirty pages has become more than 15% slower.

> Thanks for your test!
> 
> Unbelievable, i will do more test and check it more carefully.

GET_DIRTY_LOG now traverses rmap lists intensively.
So only a small change can affect the performance when there are many
dirty pages.

> Could you please open your tool, then i can reproduction it and find the
> real reason?

It's already in kvm unit tests!

> I will check whether your tool is better then kernbench/autotest after
> review your tool.

Let's focus on "lock-less" now: so dirty-log-perf is not needed now.

I think you failed to appeal the real advantage of your "lock-less" approach!
I will write about this on v3-threads.

Thanks,
	Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ