[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F923945.7030507@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:36:21 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@...il.com>
CC: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] KVM: MMU: introduce for_each_pte_list_spte
On 04/21/2012 09:01 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:01:03 +0800
> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>> I have checked dirty-log-perf myself with this patch [01-07].
>>>
>>> GET_DIRTY_LOG for 1GB dirty pages has become more than 15% slower.
>
>> Thanks for your test!
>>
>> Unbelievable, i will do more test and check it more carefully.
>
> GET_DIRTY_LOG now traverses rmap lists intensively.
> So only a small change can affect the performance when there are many
> dirty pages.
>
>> Could you please open your tool, then i can reproduction it and find the
>> real reason?
>
> It's already in kvm unit tests!
>
Great, i will check that.
>> I will check whether your tool is better then kernbench/autotest after
>> review your tool.
>
> Let's focus on "lock-less" now: so dirty-log-perf is not needed now.
>
> I think you failed to appeal the real advantage of your "lock-less" approach!
> I will write about this on v3-threads.
Thank you very much, Takuya!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists