[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F942D8D.3060508@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:10:53 +0200
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
CC: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@...ux.it>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] DLS: fix switched_from_dl
On 04/10/2012 04:25 PM, Hillf Danton wrote:
> Pull only if the current task switches from DLS, since it was not preempted
> by pushable tasks waiting on other runqueues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton<dhillf@...il.com>
> ---
>
> --- a/kernel/sched_dl.c Mon Apr 9 19:39:56 2012
> +++ b/kernel/sched_dl.c Tue Apr 10 21:23:52 2012
> @@ -1466,12 +1466,7 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *
> hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.dl_timer);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - /*
> - * Since this might be the only -deadline task on the rq,
> - * this is the right place to try to pull some other one
> - * from an overloaded cpu, if any.
> - */
> - if (!rq->dl.dl_nr_running)
> + if (p == rq->curr)
> pull_dl_task(rq);
> #endif
> }
> --
I'd stay with the original code. p (former -dl task) is going away
(changed its scheduling class from -dl to something else). If it was
the last -dl task on rq I'd probably want to pull someone else. No
assumptions needed in this case.
Thanks,
- Juri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists